• Latest
  • Trending
Uber

Uber drivers in South Africa: employees or independent contractors?

March 3, 2021
Johannesburg traffic roads

Challenges facing road users at Maalgate River Bridge R102 project

April 13, 2021
road accidents

Reduction in road accidents

April 8, 2021
NTA still waiting for Mbalula’s response to demands

Transformation imperative in aviation: Mbalula

April 8, 2021
Minibus taxis in Alexandra township, Johannesburg.

Santaco says ‘No’ to taxi fare increase while NTA gives it a thought

April 8, 2021

Gautrain offers student travel pass discounts

April 7, 2021

Most South Africans prefer travelling by foot

April 7, 2021
Integrated transport

Gauteng may give taxis a reprieve on e-tolls

April 7, 2021
NTA still waiting for Mbalula’s response to demands

Limpopo and Gauteng record high deaths during Easter

April 6, 2021
Ford SA lends helping hand to fight against Covid-19

Ford SA lends helping hand to fight against Covid-19

March 31, 2021
Toyota upgrades its Hiace Ses’fikile and improves Covid-19 driver guard

SATAXI introduces incentive scheme for taxis

March 31, 2021
DiDi

Chinese Uber Competitor DiDi Chuxing Expands To Cape Town

March 29, 2021
Uber

Uber driver behind bars for hijacking and kidnapping

March 24, 2021
Profit margins in South Africa’s minibus taxi industry have been under pressure long before the COVID-19 lockdown. Karel Prinsloo / AFP via GettyImages

Zululand taxi industry mourns King Goodwill Zwelithini 

March 24, 2021
Minibus taxis in Alexandra township, Johannesburg.

KwaZulu-Natal taxi association fights illegal operators

March 24, 2021
A Taxi Foundation in collaboration with POWA

Corporate collaborations join forces with POWA to fight GBV

March 23, 2021
taxis

Limpopo taxi body gets life back under level one

March 8, 2021
Juliet Mamqibela Murembiwa

The Iron Lady from Limpopo hails taxi industry 

March 8, 2021

Stats SA shows taxis now take more taxis 

March 8, 2021
Minibus taxis in Alexandra township, Johannesburg.

Taxi industry welcomes the easing of restrictions

March 8, 2021
Volvo C40 Recharge

Meet The New, Pure Electric Volvo C40 Recharge

March 3, 2021

Toll tariffs adjusted to 3.39% inflation rate

February 24, 2021
Taxi industry to plead for early vaccination 

Taxi industry to plead for early vaccination 

February 18, 2021
taxis

SA Taxi officially opens its doors to drive Mbombela forward

February 18, 2021
NTA still waiting for Mbalula’s response to demands

NTA still waiting for Mbalula’s response to demands

February 15, 2021
COVI19

KwaZulu-Natal suspends major events as Covid-19 wrecks havoc

February 15, 2021
taxis

Taxi industry new fight against potholes

February 15, 2021
A policeman stands guard during a protest by minibus taxi operators against a new bus service for Johannnesburg. Alexander Joe/AFP via Getty Images

Diepmeadow chairman dies under mysterious circumstances

February 15, 2021
Minibus taxis in Alexandra township, Johannesburg.

Taxi operator lives in fear of losing vehicle to the bank

February 15, 2021
A policeman stands guard during a protest by minibus taxi operators against a new bus service for Johannnesburg. Alexander Joe/AFP via Getty Images

Warring Limpopo taxis cool off after MEC intervention 

February 15, 2021
SA Taxi commemorate International Anti-Corruption Day

Taxis are Covid-19 carriers: warn Limpopo MEC

February 15, 2021
  • Contact us
  • Advertise Here
  • Login
Gibela Transport Magazine
Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Home
  • Airports
  • COVID-19
  • Editorial
  • Government
  • Rail
  • Taxis
  • Tenders
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Airports
  • COVID-19
  • Editorial
  • Government
  • Rail
  • Taxis
  • Tenders
No Result
View All Result
Gibela Transport Magazine
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
Home Cars

Uber drivers in South Africa: employees or independent contractors?

Staff Writer by Staff Writer
March 3, 2021
in Cars, Driving, People
2 0
0
Uber

Uber. Image source: pymnts.com

5
SHARES
8
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

by Kirsten Eiser, Siya Ngcamu, Shane Johnson, Keah Challenor from Webber Wentzel

​​​​​Uber drivers are currently classified as independent contractors in South Africa, but there are plans to launch a class action to compel Uber SA to confer several key rights on its drivers, which, if successful, will affect the rights of platform workers

Uber classifies its drivers as independent contractors in their terms and conditions of service. This means that Uber drivers typically are not entitled to the statutory protections afforded to employees in the various countries in which Uber operates. In South Africa, this means that drivers may be terminated at will, are not entitled to paid leave and are not subject to restrictions on hours of work.

Over the years, the classification of drivers as independent contractors has been challenged by drivers seeking greater protection in various countries (including South Africa, France, and the United Kingdom), with differing degrees of success. The recent decision by the UK Supreme Court in Uber v Aslam* marks significant progress for these drivers. The court held that the claimant Uber drivers should be considered as ‘workers’ for purposes of UK labour legislation, as workers represent a type of hybrid between an employee and an independent contractor.

The UK Supreme Court found that Uber drivers did not enjoy the freedoms usually associated with being independent contractors. Prospective drivers are presented with a standard term contract and do not have the opportunity to negotiate alternative terms. This suggests an inequality of bargaining power between Uber and drivers. Although drivers may choose when and where to work, they are not made aware of the passenger’s destination until after they have picked up the passenger. Moreover, the passenger fare is set by Uber and drivers are unable to change it. The classification of the claimant Uber drivers as ‘workers’ by the UK Supreme Court entitles them to more statutory rights than those afforded to independent contractors, but fewer than those enjoyed by employees.

In contrast to the success that the drivers have recently had in the UK, in the US federal state of California, Uber drivers are not afforded the same recognition. In 2019, the California State Legislature passed Assembly Bill 5, which would have required ride-sharing companies to classify their drivers as employees rather than independent contractors. The Bill followed a 2018 ruling by the Supreme Court of California that the burden of proof lies with the hiring entity to show that those working for the entity are independent contractors and not employees.

In October 2020, the Court of Appeal of the State of California in The People v Uber Technologies. Inc, et al A160701, A160706 had to decide whether to uphold interdictory relief restraining Uber and Lyft from classifying their drivers as independent contractors and requiring them to be reclassified as employees, pending a main trial. The Court of Appeal found that the Uber and Lyft drivers in fact performed services for Uber and Lyft in the usual course of business which were necessary for the business of Uber and Lyft to prosper. Without an exemption from the Bill for ride-sharing companies, the court was of the view that those who drive for Uber and Lyft were contemplated as employees. The Court of Appeal found that there was a reasonable probability that the employees would prove in a trial that they were employees. It accepted the trial court’s interdict to restrain Uber and Lyft from classifying their drivers as independent contractors, in violation of the Bill, pending the finalization of the trial. In November 2020, however, California residents voted in favour of Proposition 22, a ballot initiative which exempted ridesharing and delivery platforms from having to classify their drivers as employees.

In South Africa, Uber drivers are currently classified as independent contractors. In 2017, the CCMA** found that seven Uber drivers who had referred an unfair dismissal dispute to the CCMA were employees of Uber South Africa (Uber SA) under section 213 of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (LRA), but this finding was overturned by the Labour Court*** in 2018. The Labour Court held that the drivers were not employees of Uber SA as they had failed to prove that they had an employment relationship with Uber SA. However, the Labour Court explicitly stated that it was not answering the question whether or not drivers were employees of Uber BV, Uber’s parent company in the Netherlands. Notably, the UK Supreme Court decision held that the drivers worked for Uber London rather than Uber BV.

Pursuant to the UK Supreme Court decision, UK law firm Leigh Day, in collaboration with SA law firm Mbuyisa Moleele Attorneys, announced plans to introduce a class action on behalf of SA Uber drivers against Uber. The law firms have indicated that they will argue that drivers should be provided with paid leave, overtime pay and membership of the Unemployment Insurance Fund. Uber SA maintains that most drivers wish to work independently and that Uber, using its current operating model, continues to contribute to job creation in South Africa. No indication has been given as to when the class action will be launched.

The UK Supreme Court’s decision does not necessarily mean that the CCMA/Labour Court will follow suit. The UK Supreme Court’s findings were based on the reality of the relationship between Uber and its drivers. The tests used by the UK Supreme Court correspond to the tests traditionally used by the South African courts to determine whether an individual should be classified as an employee or independent contractor. However, the factual situation in South Africa is different and more complicated, as SA Uber drivers tend to be drivers rather than driver partners. Driver partners own the cars they use, but drivers use a car owned by someone else (i.e. a driver partner). Where partners give instructions to drivers and exert a degree of control over how they carry out their duties, such as by specifying where they operate, the relationship between drivers and partners starts to resemble one of employment, which could weaken a claim that SA Uber drivers are employed by Uber.

Other potential legislative interventions which could offer greater protection to drivers include:

(1) The incorporation of the Fairwork Code of Good Practice for the Regulation of Platform Work in South Africa into the LRA   (2) A declaration by the Minister of Employment and Labour in terms of section 83(1) of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 (BCEA) that ride-sharing drivers are deemed to be employees for the purposes of selected sections of the BCEA and LRA

​

Following two years of empirical research, the Fairwork Project drafted the Code of Good Practice for the Regulation of Platform Work in South Africa, which is aimed at providing platform workers with five key rights: minimum wages; protection under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 85 of 1993; written contracts setting out their working conditions; fair management; and freedom of organisation.

Section 83(1) of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 (BCEA) empowers the Minister of Employment and Labour to deem any category of persons to be employees for the purposes of any part of any employment legislation, except for the Unemployment Insurance Act 63 of 2001. The Minister could accordingly declare that ride-sharing drivers, or platform workers in general, are deemed to be employees for selected sections of the BCEA and LRA.

The outcome of the potential class action will significantly influence not only the rights of Uber drivers, but also the rights of other individuals undertaking platform work. This is an area which we will continue to monitor, and we will provide updates as soon as new developments arise.

* Uber BV and others (Appellants) v Aslam and others (Respondents) [2021] UKSC 5

** Uber South Africa Technological Services (Pty) Ltd / National Union of Public Service and Allied Workers and South African Transport and Allied Workers Union obo Morekure and others [2017] 11 BALR 1247 (CCMA)

*** Uber South Africa Technology Services (Pty) Ltd v National Union of Public Service and Allied Workers (NUPSAW) and Others (2018) 39 ILJ 903 (LC)

Ends…

Tags: UberUber driver

Would you like to hear more about this? You can subscribe here ...

Unsubscribe
Staff Writer

Staff Writer

Related Posts

Johannesburg traffic roads
Roads

Challenges facing road users at Maalgate River Bridge R102 project

by Mokgalwane Mogano
April 13, 2021
Minibus taxis in Alexandra township, Johannesburg.
People

Santaco says ‘No’ to taxi fare increase while NTA gives it a thought

by Giyani Shivambo
April 8, 2021
People

Gautrain offers student travel pass discounts

by Mokgalwane Mogano
April 7, 2021
People

Most South Africans prefer travelling by foot

by Mokgalwane Mogano
April 7, 2021

Latest

  • All
  • Taxis
  • Rail
Minibus taxi

Taxi sector finds a united voice through its own union

October 26, 2020
SA Taxi commemorate International Anti-Corruption Day

SA Taxi Commemorates International Anti-Corruption Day

December 9, 2020
taxis

How to keep your taxi on the road and your business ticking over

October 29, 2020

Browse by Tags

ACSA Arrive Alive Aviation BMW coronavirus COVID-19 Department of Transport Eskom featured Fikile Mbalula Gautrain Jacob Mamabolo Mbalula Mbombela minibus taxi Minibus taxis Minister Mbalula National Taxi Alliance NTA President Cyril Ramaphosa public transport RTIA RTMC SANRAL Santaco SA Taxi South Africa Taxi Indaba taxi industry Taxi Lekgotla taxis taxi violence Tender Toyota Transaction Capital Transport Transport Minister Transport Month Uber Volvo VW Commercial VW Crafter Women Women's Month Zimbabwe
Gibela Transport Magazine

GIBELA is a digital and print publication and a premier source of transport news on minibus taxis, aviation, e-hailing, cars, logistic transport, rail, the Gautrain, mobiity-as-a-service, (transport) technology and bus services.

MAIN MENU

  • Home
  • Airports
  • COVID-19
  • Editorial
  • Government
  • Rail
  • Taxis
  • Tenders

SPEAK TO US

  • Contact us
  • Advertise Here

© 2020 All copyrights reserved - Gibela Online Transport Magazine; part of Motho Media & Geko Publishing (Pty) Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Landing Page
  • Buy JNews
  • Support Forum
  • Contact Us

© 2020 All copyrights reserved - Gibela Online Transport Magazine; part of Motho Media & Geko Publishing (Pty) Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.